
The sufferings of farm animals
Old macdonald had a factory
What do we think of when we stroll along the aisles of
the supermarket looking at the almost clinical cellophane-wrapped
parcels of lamb or beef? Few of us have had the opportunity to see
what goes on in the production of meat. Our ideas about farming are
often based on childhood picture-book illustrations of happy cows,
fluffy yellow chicks, and pink pigs with curly tails running around
a farmyard. Our ideas about farming - if we have any - can
be highly romanticized and sanitized. Most of us have never set foot
in a farmyard, and I probably wouldn't have either, if it were not
for the fact that I'd trained as a vet. I'd like to take you on a
guided tour of the modern farm. We don't have the time or space to
look at every detail, or every animal; I will give just a few examples
to convey a feeling for what life is like for a farm animal today.
Life for farm animals nowadays is not pleasant and you
will almost certainly find parts of this account distressing. The
accounts I give are of general modern farm practices
- they don't represent the worst (and sometimes illegal) things
that go on in the factory farm. There are relatively compassionate
farmers who keep their animals in far better conditions than I describe.
In addition, the regulations governing animal welfare, as well as
the degree of enforcement of those regulations, varies from country
to country. In some ways animals in less industrialized countries
have freer lives, but in other ways life - and death - for
animals, just as for humans, can be far crueller in poorer parts of
the world. What you are about to read is a fairly typical account
of how farm animals live in the industrialized world.
Cattle
A cow's natural life expectancy is twenty
years - fairly long for an animal - but
most won't live beyond four. The demands placed upon their bodies,
draining milk at a rate which nature never intended, will typically
leave them spent by their fourth year. Naturally, their bodies would
produce less than 1,000 litres of milk in a year. Due to selective
breeding and modern husbandry techniques, they deliver between 6,000
and 12,000 litres.
To achieve this they are milked almost all year round, even while
pregnant. There is a period of only a few weeks during which they
are given a respite. This is when they are heavily pregnant and their
body simply couldn't cope with a growing foetus as well as milking.
Dairy cows often experience metabolic diseases because they can't
take in enough nutrition to meet the demands of the milking machine.
Their systems may run short of calcium or magnesium, bringing them
to the point where they physically collapse. The demands placed on
the cows' metabolism mean that they are often effectively malnourished,
no matter how much they eat.
Cows are commonly artificially inseminated with semen from one of
the large beef breeds. This gives a more valuable calf, which is good
for the farmer. Unfortunately for the cow, this means that they give
birth to a far larger calf than their pelvic girdle allows for. They
frequently suffer greatly giving birth to these huge offspring, or
require Caesarean operations, which weaken them further and shorten
their lives.
A cow has to calve every year to produce milk, but her calf
is taken away shortly after birth and fed on reconstituted milk. The
mother's milk is too valuable a commodity to waste on a calf. Like
most animals, the cow has a strongly developed maternal instinct and
it's distressing for her to lose her calf. It's upsetting for the
calf as well.
Whereas a calf would have suckled, on and off, all day long, the cow
is milked by machine, usually only twice a day. Cows frequently suffer
from painful mastitis - due mainly to the amount of milk they
have to produce. The pressure of accumulated milk causes great pain.
Cows sometimes kick their own udders because they are in such distress.
Eventually the strain may cause the ligaments of the udder to give
way and the cow will be useless for milking. A short trip to the abattoir
and her brief life is over.
People often assume that cows produce milk just because they are cows,
and that producing milk is what they do - as if it were their
job. But cows produce milk only in order to feed a calf. They have
to be made pregnant every year so that they keep producing milk. This
results in a lot of calves as a side-effect of milk production. What
happens to a calf once it is taken from its mother? Not many need
to be kept to maintain the dairy herd. Some 42 per cent of them
end up as beef at around eighteen months old. Some are sent off a
few days old to be reared as veal. The meat industry and the dairy
industry are inseparable and as much as 80 per cent of beef
comes from dairy farms.
The calves destined to become beef tend to have the most natural lives.
Some are kept on grass and can roam relatively freely, although many
live out their lives on concrete and are fed concentrates to accelerate
their growth. They may be castrated and dehorned. Both
these operations are highly stressful and usually very painful. The
animals find being handled very distressing and they are often castrated
without anaesthetic. Animals are dehorned to make them safer to handle.
The operation should be performed under local anaesthetic. Unfortunately,
animals are usually dehorned in batches, so the anaesthetic often
hasn't started to work or it may have begun to wear off by the time
the dehorning starts. Worse still, I knew one vet who didn't always
use anaesthetics at all because some farmers wouldn't pay the extra
cost. 'If they see me taking the anaesthetic out of my bag they just
laugh,' he told me.
You may wonder why having a horn cut off requires anaesthetics. The
reason is that horns contain nerves and blood vessels. Having a horn
removed is not like having your fingernails trimmed but more like
having a finger or even a hand sawn off.
Veal was originally just the meat of an unweaned one- or two-day-old
calf. Because they were so young, and had never eaten grass or exercised,
their meat was unusually pale and tender. It was also expensive because
there isn't much eating on a baby calf. Now veal production
has become an industrial process. The calves are still taken from
their mothers at a day old, but they are now kept in highly artificial
conditions in order to keep their flesh pale and soft. Veal calves
often live in pens so small that they can barely move. This stops
them from using their muscles, so their flesh remains very tender.
Sometimes they are kept in virtual darkness because there is a rather
irrational belief that this contributes to the paleness of the meat.
This makes observation for illness next to impossible, of course,
so disease may go untreated.
However, the very nature of veal production prevents the welfare of
veal calves being of crucial interest to those who rear them. The
calves are allowed no solid food and are fed only on milk substitutes
deficient in iron. Veal calves are deliberately made ill with
anaemia in order to keep the meat pale. A malnourished calf is the
whole point of the veal system. In addition, their stomachs, which
are designed to process large quantities of roughage, are deprived
of anything solid whatsoever. The calves are not even allowed straw
to lie on in case they eat it. Their craving for roughage is so strong
that they chew on wood and eat their own coats. Their lives are very
distressing.
However, even before the calves reach the veal units they have to
face the stresses of transportation. It's unpleasant and distressing
for us to be in a bus or crowded underground train in the rush-hour;
how much more so then for animals being transported for (as current
uk regulations allow) up to 28 hours in such conditions,
for much of that time unable to feed or drink. At least when we endure
such circumstances for a much shorter period we know why we are there
- the animals are terror-stricken because of the unfamiliarity
of the whole experience. It was against these movements of animals
that thousands of people protested at airports and docks in the uk
in 1995. These mass demonstrations resulted in changes in the
regulations affecting uk veal production, but conditions
in many other parts of the world are unchanged.
Chickens
Chickens are reared in more intensive conditions than
any other farm animal. Despite the increased availability of so-called
free-range eggs the overwhelming majority of laying chickens
still live in tiny wire cages in vast sheds. Usually there are five
birds to a cage, and each bird has a living space slightly less than
the size of this opened book. There is hardly enough room to turn
round. Birds kept in these conditions develop 'vices', or destructive
behavioural habits, and they often have their beaks painfully severed
to prevent them from pecking at, and even eating, each other. It's
worth adding that chickens are not particularly nasty creatures. It's
simply intensely frustrating for them not to be able to fulfil any
of their natural urges. They aren't able to stretch their wings, dust-
bathe,
walk, establish social structures, forage for food, or sit on eggs.
Take away these natural outlets and birds go mad.
The wire of the cages imprisoning the birds irritates their feet,
resulting in sores that will go untreated (with 30,000 birds
in a shed there is no personal attention). The birds' feet can even
become 'welded' to the wire mesh as their claws or flesh grow around
the metal. If they are lucky they are within reach of food and water
when this happens.
Laying birds are usually killed at the end of a year. They are all
females, of course. Skilled workers separate the males from the females
at one day old and treat them as a waste product. They may be killed
by gassing, or suffocated in rubbish bags, or they may be thrown into
boxes where they crush and suffocate each other. Some, it is claimed,
are thrown live into mincing machines to be used for animal feed.(footnote 1)
They look exactly like the fluffy yellow Easter chicks that we see
on greetings cards.
Many so-called free-range chickens don't fare
much better. Despite the more attractive label, many rarely get outside.
They are often crammed into sheds in their tens of thousands in conditions
that are far from natural. These overcrowded conditions also prevent
the birds from fulfilling their full range of natural activities and
from establishing a proper social structure. Bullying and stress
are common. A small group of dominant and aggressive hens can prevent
the others from getting to the outside world, making a nonsense of
the 'free-range' label.
Chickens for eating are called 'broilers.' They live (you're
probably getting the hang of this by now) in huge sheds in tens of
thousands, sometimes crowded together on the floor in a living carpet,
sometimes in racks of cages. The amount of space recommended by the
Ministry of Agriculture gives them about the same amount of room,
when fully grown, as a battery hen.
They stand on their own accumulated faeces, which quickly become disease-ridden.
The lights are dimmed to reduce the stress of overcrowding so the
stockman probably won't see animals that are ill or have died. In
any event there may be only one stockman for tens of thousands of
birds, making effective supervision impossible. Health experts consider
these sheds to be a serious hazard for workers. As one writer points
out:
'Researchers warned chicken farmers to spend as little time
as possible in their sheds and to wear a respirator when they go in.
But the study said nothing about respirators for the chickens.(footnote 2)
Pigs
Few pigs will ever have the opportunity to be
outside, to run, to wallow in mud, to dig, to nest (yes, wild pigs
build nests), or to play. Pigs are as smart as clever dogs, and like
most intelligent animals pigs are very playful.
Instead, most pigs live in concrete boxes or are confined by iron
bars in warehouse-sized sheds. The breeding sows have the worst time
of it. Most of the time they stand singly in stalls so narrow that
they are unable to turn round. They have no bedding and lie on bare
concrete. Pigs don't find it any easier than you or I to lie on concrete,
so you can perhaps imagine the discomfort. They have no way of socializing
or playing or of fulfilling any of their natural impulses. Life is
brutally painful and devastatingly boring.
The sow leaves her stall only when it is time for mating or for transfer
to the farrowing accommodation where she will give birth to her litter.
Again she lives on bare concrete and often can do nothing except lie
down and stand up because the space is too narrow to allow anything
else.
A farm worker snaps her piglets' eye-teeth off, severs their tails,
and castrates the males - all usually at a few days old and without
anaesthetic. After weaning, the piglets are kept in batches -
usually on a concrete slatted floor in a bare concrete box. Any intelligent
animal would become bored in such conditions and pigs are no exception.
They often become so frustrated in such unnatural and limiting conditions
that they become deranged. Young pigs often indulge in neurotic behaviour
such as suckling each other or inanimate objects. They frequently
go insane. A common sign of this is tail-biting, where pigs bite the
tails of their fellow-inmates, gnawing them to the base of the spine.
This is why they have their tails removed at an early age. However,
once bored pigs have reached this level of psychopathy they may gnaw
the remaining stump of the tail as far down as they can. Another similar
'vice' that pigs develop in these conditions is vulva-biting. The
prominent vulva of the females is an easy target for a deranged pig.
Because so many pigs live in one building, airborne infections spread
easily. As a result, pneumonia is widespread. When animals stand on
slats above their own faeces and urine, as they usually do, the ammonia
produced is an irritant to the respiratory system, further aiding
the spread of respiratory infections. Leg injuries and arthritis are
common because the pigs live on concrete and cannot exercise, and
because forced rapid growth puts strain on the joints.
The concrete boxes in which fattening pigs live commonly overheat
in warm weather. Since pigs, contrary to the popular saying, cannot
sweat, they have to roll in their own faeces to keep cool. Imagine
yourself in the same position.
If you are beginning to think that pigs are nasty animals because
of tail- and vulva-biting then think again. You won't see this kind
of behaviour in the wild. It is the result of sheer boredom. They
are signs of insanity. Humans kept in similar conditions would
do crazy things as well. The 'vice' is surely not that of the animal
but the conditions that bring about this derangement.
Sheep
Sheep are the least intensively reared farm
animals. In most of the world they tend to have relatively natural
lives, brought indoors only for lambing and receiving little handling
except during shearing and dipping. The downside of this is that they
often die through exposure, neglect, or starvation. Sheep form a large
percentage of the 16,000 large animals that die on British farms
every day.(footnote 3)Many sheep are kept on hill farms and at lambing
time in particular their mortality rate, due to disease and exposure
to a harsh hill climate, is especially high. In Britain, 23
per cent of single-born lambs and 55 per cent of twins die on
extensive pastures.(footnote 4)
The thick woolly coats that we associate with sheep are not entirely
natural but are the product of selective breeding, or 'unnatural
selection'.
In the rain their wool soaks up masses of water (making for a fairly
miserable sheep), and in the summer they overheat. Sheep are very
prone to painfully itchy skin infections due to their woolly coats.
The organophosphate chemicals in which they are dipped to prevent
the spread of parasitic diseases are a major health hazard for the
farmers, who don't actually have to go into the dip-bath. What does
it do to the sheep?
A sheep's main problem is its lack of financial value. Few sheep are
worth much, so they tend not to be given prompt medical attention.
If you ever see sheep grazing 'kneeling down' it's because
standing
is too painful for them. This happens when the ground is persistently
wet during periods of heavy rainfall, and fungal infections, followed
by secondary bacterial infections, invade the hoofs, causing great
pain. Judging by the severity of some of the cases I've observed,
first aid for sheep is not usually a priority.
A story one farmer told me sums up the lack of regard given to individual
sheep. One of his ewes was having trouble lambing. Rather than waste
money calling the vet to do a Caesarean - which would cost as
much as the ewe was worth - he did the operation himself, with
a carving knife and no anaesthetic. He was pleased with himself for
having saved money.
The kind of treatment farm animals receive may seem incredible. What
would happen if you or I tried to keep a dog in the conditions that
a pig has to endure, or if we confined a pet bird so that it couldn't
spread its wings? In any civilized country a court would quite rightly
prosecute us for cruelty. Farmers can keep animals in such conditions
only because of the demand for cheap meat. There is a chain of causality
connecting a consumer's appetite with the kind of suffering we
have seen.
Fish are the only commonly eaten animals living an entirely natural
life (except for farmed fish). However, their death through
suffocation when they are taken from the water must be deeply unpleasant.
Fish farming causes serious pollution, not least because of the heavy
metals used in anti-fouling paints used to prevent molluscs and seaweed
colonizing the fishes' cages. We have to remember that eating fish
also puts us into competition with fish-eating wildlife. Part of the
true price of fish is the culling programmes carried out on wild animals
like seals and birds of prey to make sure there are enough fish for
human consumption. Vast numbers of the fish caught in nets are not
used for human consumption. The fishing industry call them 'trash',
and dumps their corpses at sea. 'Trash' can constitute as much as
half of a catch.(footnote 5)An additional indicator of our lack of regard
for both fish and land animals is that 40 to 50 per cent
of the world's fish catch is fed to farm animals - most of which
are naturally vegetarian.(footnote 6)
The way of all flesh
'Neither with their legs nor with their horns do the cows
hurt anybody, being obedient like lambs and yielding jars of milk.
The king, seizing them by the horns, had them killed by a sword.
Then the gods, the ancestors, Indra, the titans and the
demons cried out as the sword fell on the cows: 'This is
unjust!'(footnote 7)
Few of us would wish to visit an abattoir.
They are hellish places. The stench of death, the blood-slicked floors,
the noise of machinery, chain-saws tearing flesh and bone, the report
of the captive bolt pistols that stun animals before they
have their throats cut and, above all, the noises of fear and distress
as animals are led to their deaths; all contribute to make a slaughterhouse
a hell on earth.
In the abattoir, haste is essential to keep costs down. Animals have
to be bullied to come forward to the killing area as quickly as possible.
Some abattoir workers believe that a distressed animal makes for
better meat due to the release of adrenaline. This 'fight or flight'
hormone - released in conditions of fear - tenderizes the
muscles and helps stop the meat from becoming infected with bacteria.
Slaughtermen are often therefore at no pains to make the animals'
last minutes less distressing than they need be. Electric cattle prods
goad animals towards the slaughtering area. That these implements
are distressing can be inferred from the fact that they are a favoured
instrument of torture in countries with the worst records of human
rights abuses.
Abattoir workers have to stun all animals that are to be slaughtered
to lessen the animals' distress. The exception to this is Muslim (halal)
or Jewish (kosher) slaughter, where animals are fully conscious while
they are turned upside-down and have their throats cut. The distress
of this is unimaginable, and it is worth remembering that many animals
slaughtered in this way end up on the shelves of our supermarkets.(footnote 8)
A common method of stunning is by captive-bolt pistol. A metal rod
is fired from a gun into the brain, destroying the higher functions.
A flexible plastic rod is then inserted in the bullet hole and stirred
to destroy the reflexes in the lower brain - a process known as
'pithing'. Pithing is done to prevent the corpse from thrashing around
and injuring the workers. Pigs, and sometimes sheep, are often stunned
with electric tongs, which, in theory, render the animal unconscious.
More rarely a carbon dioxide gas chamber may be used. These have been
described by researchers as causing 'severe respiratory
distress'.(footnote 9)
Electric tongs are, understandably, dangerous to the workers, and
problems arise because low voltages are used in order to render them
less hazardous. Animals commonly begin to recover consciousness before
they are killed. In any event some people believe that animals stunned
in this way are not unconscious at all, merely paralysed. One hopes
that this is not true - it must be appalling to be aware of what
is happening but unable even to cry out. Even when carried out effectively
the electric stunning is likely to be extremely painful, as humans
who have experienced similar shocks report.(footnote 10)The actual killing
is achieved by cutting the arteries that carry blood to the brain.
Chickens are killed in specialized processing plants. They too have
to be stunned first, and this is usually done by suspending them upside-down
by the legs on a conveyor line that leads them towards an electrically
charged saline bath. Inevitably, as some of the birds struggle, they
manage to miss being stunned and are still conscious when they reach
the rotating blades that sever the carotid arteries.
Some authorities believe it is better to allow animals destined for
slaughter to see their fellows being killed in order to shorten the
time they have to wait in terror. Others hold that animals should
wait longer so that they are spared seeing their fellows being killed.(footnote 11)
It is a useful exercise in empathy to decide which we would prefer
if such circumstances were forced upon us. Afterwards we could reflect
on whether we want to put animals in that situation at all.
Notes:
1: Peter Singer, Animal Liberation , Random House, London
1995, p.108.
2: Animal Liberation , op. cit., p.105.
3: Veterinary Record vol.iii no.2, 1982. Quoted
in Kath Clements, Why Vegan , Heretic, London 1995, p.56.
4: 'Piggy in the middle', New Scientist, 23 January 1999.
5: Animal Liberation , op. cit., p.173.
6: John Bennett, The Hunger Machine , Polity, Cambridge
1987, p.37.
7: H. Saddhatissa (trans.), Sutta Nipata , Curzon, London
1985, p.34.
8: Farm Animal Welfare Council, Report on the Welfare of
Livestock (Red Meat Animals) at the Time of Slaughter , hmso,
London 1984, paragraphs 88 and 124.
9: Agscene , no.128, Winter 1997, p.13.
10: Animal Liberation , op. cit., p.152.
11: See, for example, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food's Response to the Report on the Welfare of Livestock (Red Meat Animals) at the Time of Slaughter, MAFF, Surbiton 1985,pp.7-8, where the pros and cons are discussed.
Buy this book